← Questions
Reward-model RLHF versus direct preference optimization
0
I was asked this
No reports yet. Sign in to say where you were asked it.
Walk through a classic RLHF pipeline: supervised fine-tuning, a reward model trained on preference pairs, then policy optimization (PPO) with a KL penalty to the reference model. Then explain how DPO reaches a similar goal with no reward model and no sampling loop, what its loss compares, and what role the reference model still plays. Compare cost, stability and failure modes, and say when you would pick each.
No official answer yet. Draw yours on the right; publish it and it shows under Community.
Nothing published yet. Publish your canvas and it shows here for others to open and remix.
Draw your answer hereBoxes, arrows and notes, saved for you to come back to.Sign in to start drawing


